|
The injustice of $1900 differences in Minnesota per pupil spending |
PDF
|
| Print |
|
E-mail
|
|
posted 11/06/09
Is it fair or wise that Anoka Hennepin will be able to spend $165 per
pupil, beyond what the state provides, South St. Paul will be able to spend
$1010/per pupil, and North Branch won’t be able to spend anything beyond
what the state provides? No. I think it’s wrong. It's not wise or
responsible.
While 71% of the fifty-eight districts reporting to the Minnesota School
Boards Association passed at least one of the requests that they made to
local taxpayers, election results seem to show that Minnesota needs
fundamental reform in how we fund public schools. Asking candidates for
governor about what they will propose seems like a very high priority.
Based on information available at the Minnesota School Boards Association
website, here are some of the decisions that voters made around the state.
This varies by age of student. Minnesota also provides additional funds for
students coming from low income families or families where English is not
the first language.
The following are some of the district requests APPROVED for per pupil
spending above the state average.
Anoka Hennepin will be able to spend $165
Rushford Peterson will be able to spend $940/pupil
South St. Paul will spend $1010/pupil
Wayzata will spend $1609/pupil
Ulen Hitterdahl will spend $1990/pupil.
Based on information from the Minnesota School Board Association, here are
examples of places where tax payers said no:
Cambridge-Isanti, Rejected increase to either $288 or $319/pupil
Milaca, Rejected increase to $200-$500 per pupil, from $1/pupil
North Branch: Rejected request 140 - $335/pupil, currently no levy
Spending more is not an absolute guarantee of higher achievement. We have
considerable research to show that some ways of spending produce greater
gains in achievement and graduation rates than others.
Even so, don’t the figures above raise fundamental questions of fairness
in amounts being spent per typical Minnesota student? As the statistics
above show, this can vary by several hundred, up to $1900/pupil.
Over the next year, i’m going to write about several options for
improving the way Minnesota funds its schools. Today, I simply want to
share the figures above with you.
If it’s not fair for some districts to spend $940 or $1605, or even 1990
per pupil more than others, isn’t it time to change?
|
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 06 November 2009 )
|