|
As we near the beginning of a new school year, the recent
release of test scores has some parents puzzled and some educators exasperated.
Many people have contacted me with questions and frustrations. Here’s a brief response to three of the most
frequently asked questions:
1. If
the school our child(ren) attend(s) is on the list, does this mean the school
is failing? Should I be looking for
another school?
No, and not necessarily. The recently released tests show how students
from each school are doing on statewide tests of reading and math. The federal government, through its No Child
Left Behind Law, requires that each state set its own standards in these areas,
and then test students to see how they are doing.
The federal law requires virtually
all students (except a very small percentage of severely mentally handicapped
students and students who are just starting to learn English, to be
“proficient” by 2014. Most educators and
researchers think that this is an unrealistic expectation, unless the standards
are very low.
The NCLB law requires that each
school have a growing percentage of its students ranked “proficient.” Yearly targets are set, based in part on the
expectation of 100% proficiency (with exceptions noted above) and how well a
school’s students did the previous year.
Even if 95% of a schools’ students are proficient, if a group of 40 or
more low income, limited English speaking, female, male, or specific racial
group fails to meet the standard, the school will be placed on the “needs improvement
list.”
Students, like schools are more
than test scores. Does the youngster feel safe, encouraged and respected? Does the youngster look forward to attending
school? Is the student making progress
academically and with other students?
Wise families consider these and other issues in selecting a school.
2. If our child’s school is not on the list, does
that mean the school is fine? No.
Please consider the questions just above. A school may have high scores but have other
problems. Sometimes families look for
another school because their youngster is bored or is because other youngsters
are not treating her/him well. Test
scores are NOT enough to determine whether a school is the best place for your
youngster.
3. Isn’t NCLB really an attempt to discredit
public education? Many educators
have asked me about this. When he was alive, the late Senator Paul Wellstone
strongly urged Senate Democrats not to agree to key provisions of the NLCB
law. However, Senator Ted Kennedy was a
strong, powerful supporter of the law (as well as a strong supporter of public
education). Without his efforts, the law would not have been adopted. It may be that Senator Kennedy was
misinformed and, as he has more recently insisted, felt that more money would
accompany the legislation. But Kennedy
clearly supported key aspects of the legislation.
Students learn best with informed, encouraging families and
knowledgeable, positive educators. This
column will try to help with both in the coming year.
|